Luke Freeman

All topics allowed. Board rules apply.

Moderators: ZENITH R, qprdotorgadmin, nige101uk, willesdenr, Virginia_R

User avatar
UxbridgeR
dot.org legend
dot.org legend
Posts: 11172
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 12:45 pm

Re: Luke Freeman

Post by UxbridgeR » Mon Aug 28, 2023 2:12 pm

You came up with the names, not me. And if we're definitively judging players as good signings after 3 or 4 games, or in Colback's case, 1, then the lowering of standards is continuing apace.

The idea that a club with very little money can afford to sign someone like Freeman merely as cover or back-up and potentially reward him with a contract extension if he manages 20 games is insane to me. We need bodies for sure, and I would much rather we spend what we have on some younger legs. Maybe the manager could use his much vaunted knowledge of the lower divisions and players who have been rejected elsewhere.
If Freeman is still widely rated, he'll have better offers anyway.
Are headphones getting bigger, or are idiots getting smaller ?

pindarus
Level 1 dot.orger
Level 1 dot.orger
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:25 pm

Re: Luke Freeman

Post by pindarus » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:15 pm

Quite. This was Ainsworths main selling point and we have seen not a smidgeon of what he promised. None of the signings are going to earn a penny for us if we want to sell them on.

jimjams
Level 2 dot.orger
Level 2 dot.orger
Posts: 787
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:50 pm

Re: Luke Freeman

Post by jimjams » Mon Aug 28, 2023 11:38 pm

UxbridgeR wrote:
Sat Aug 26, 2023 4:08 pm
jimjams wrote:
Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:57 pm
UxbridgeR wrote:
Fri Aug 25, 2023 1:56 pm
Surely Richards, Dixon-Bonner and Duke-McKenna are or can play as central midfielders.

The squad is arguably short in all areas, but striker and right back seem more important areas to strengthen than midfield to me.
I'd say the continued selection of Dozzell suggests otherwise.
Dozzell has been pretty decent so far this season.
Yeah, I agree he has been pretty good. But I still think the quality he's shown overall so far means he shouldn't really be one of the first names on the team sheet (which he is if we are playing two in the middle), and also that we don't really have enough else in that position.

User avatar
Montag
Level 5 dot.orger
Level 5 dot.orger
Posts: 5554
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 8:26 pm

Re: Luke Freeman

Post by Montag » Sat Sep 02, 2023 8:30 pm

So, it looks like no one took Luke on? Odd really. He was very good for us.
"Go, muster men: My council is my shield ; We must be brief, when traitors brave the field."
Richard III, Act IV, W. Shakespeare

User avatar
222gers
Level 5 dot.orger
Level 5 dot.orger
Posts: 6024
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: LONDON

Re: Luke Freeman

Post by 222gers » Sat Sep 02, 2023 8:46 pm

Am I correct in thinking that free agents are not subject to the window “ slamming shut “ ?
If so, we could still be in for Luke and Chris Martin and even…….a return on a short term contract for Amos.

User avatar
ZENITH R
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10035
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:40 pm
Location: North Derbyshire

Re: Luke Freeman

Post by ZENITH R » Sat Sep 02, 2023 9:00 pm

222gers wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 8:46 pm
Am I correct in thinking that free agents are not subject to the window “ slamming shut “ ?
If so, we could still be in for Luke and Chris Martin and even…….a return on a short term contract for Amos.

You are correct Sir.
Saturday 9th November 1968: QPR V Burnley in the First Division - I saw the Hoops for the first time and my obsession began!

Remember:
Growing old is inevitable.
Growing up is optional.

User avatar
UxbridgeR
dot.org legend
dot.org legend
Posts: 11172
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 12:45 pm

Re: Luke Freeman

Post by UxbridgeR » Sun Sep 03, 2023 4:26 pm

If we end up with Chris Martin coming back in, somebody really ought to be fired. Pathetic stuff.
Are headphones getting bigger, or are idiots getting smaller ?

Post Reply