Page 10 of 11

Re: Biden

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:56 pm
by Andy_N19
Montag wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:29 pm
Andy_N19 wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:24 pm
Montag wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 1:35 pm


But you DO support the censorship then?
Have you overdosed on Remdesivir?
Rather than answer you resort to insults. How immature.
No, serious comment, because Trump advocated taking the drug liberally [sic] in order to ward off the
threat of Covid-19 or have you forgotten?

Re: Biden

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:28 pm
by UxbridgeR
Montag wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 1:42 pm
NO THEY ARE NOT. THEY ARE NOT A PUBLISHER AND ONCE THEY BECOME ONE THEY ARE SUBJECT TO PUBLISHING LAWS WHICH AT PRESENT THEY ARE NOT. But of course that needs to be enforced and without Trump it won't be. Serfs ye were and serfs ye shall remain. Until doomsday.
What needs to be enforced ? Are you suggesting that Trump is the only thing saving the US from serfdom ?

Re: Biden

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:07 pm
by Montag
Andy_N19 wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:56 pm
Montag wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:29 pm
Andy_N19 wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:24 pm


Have you overdosed on Remdesivir?
Rather than answer you resort to insults. How immature.
No, serious comment, because Trump advocated taking the drug liberally [sic] in order to ward off the
threat of Covid-19 or have you forgotten?
You assume because I am concerned about election integrity that I support Trump? If that's a serious comment then you must have one hell of a train set.

Re: Biden

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:11 pm
by Montag
UxbridgeR wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:28 pm
Montag wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 1:42 pm
NO THEY ARE NOT. THEY ARE NOT A PUBLISHER AND ONCE THEY BECOME ONE THEY ARE SUBJECT TO PUBLISHING LAWS WHICH AT PRESENT THEY ARE NOT. But of course that needs to be enforced and without Trump it won't be. Serfs ye were and serfs ye shall remain. Until doomsday.
What needs to be enforced ? Are you suggesting that Trump is the only thing saving the US from serfdom ?
Big tech wanted Trump out. Why? Know your place - That's what Richard II was saying in 1381. I'm sure you've looked it up by now.

Re: Biden

Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2020 9:08 am
by Andy_N19
Montag wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:07 pm
Andy_N19 wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:56 pm
Montag wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:29 pm

Rather than answer you resort to insults. How immature.
No, serious comment, because Trump advocated taking the drug liberally [sic] in order to ward off the
threat of Covid-19 or have you forgotten?
You assume because I am concerned about election integrity that I support Trump? If that's a serious comment then you must have one hell of a train set.

There's nothing to suggest that you don't support Trump, by the way why haven't you answered dm's earlier requests?

Re: Biden

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 3:14 pm
by Montag
Andy_N19 wrote:
Fri Dec 18, 2020 9:08 am
Montag wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:07 pm
Andy_N19 wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:56 pm


No, serious comment, because Trump advocated taking the drug liberally [sic] in order to ward off the
threat of Covid-19 or have you forgotten?
You assume because I am concerned about election integrity that I support Trump? If that's a serious comment then you must have one hell of a train set.

There's nothing to suggest that you don't support Trump, by the way why haven't you answered dm's earlier requests?
I support Democracy and the will of the people. I am no longer tied by ideologies, only by principles. Thanks to SCOTUS bottling it there is now a chance that Martial Law is coming to the US and a chance that the contested states will have their elections re-run under military supervision. If Biden really won these states then he will win them again in an air-tight election, won't he? Did you know that a credible witness has reported hearing a terrible row when the SCOTUS met to discuss hearing the Texas led case? One judge was refusing to hear the case NOT on legal precedent but on the possibility of riots. That means he knew the evidence would overturn the results in those states. Only 2 justices had the balls to hear it the others brown-trousered. If they don't hear it, they don't have to adjudicate and no-one comes round their house. This is mob rule. Nothing more, nothing less. Whatever happens, the US is going to be torn in half and DT is the least of the causes.

Because they are designed as an insult. My question to you is far more pertinent.

Re: Biden

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 5:58 pm
by dm
Montag wrote:
Sat Dec 19, 2020 3:14 pm
Andy_N19 wrote:
Fri Dec 18, 2020 9:08 am
Montag wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:07 pm


You assume because I am concerned about election integrity that I support Trump? If that's a serious comment then you must have one hell of a train set.

There's nothing to suggest that you don't support Trump, by the way why haven't you answered dm's earlier requests?
I support Democracy and the will of the people. I am no longer tied by ideologies, only by principles. Thanks to SCOTUS bottling it there is now a chance that Martial Law is coming to the US and a chance that the contested states will have their elections re-run under military supervision. If Biden really won these states then he will win them again in an air-tight election, won't he? Did you know that a credible witness has reported hearing a terrible row when the SCOTUS met to discuss hearing the Texas led case? One judge was refusing to hear the case NOT on legal precedent but on the possibility of riots. That means he knew the evidence would overturn the results in those states. Only 2 justices had the balls to hear it the others brown-trousered. If they don't hear it, they don't have to adjudicate and no-one comes round their house. This is mob rule. Nothing more, nothing less. Whatever happens, the US is going to be torn in half and DT is the least of the causes.

Because they are designed as an insult. My question to you is far more pertinent.
And still, as Andy said, you've still not answered my questions. Why is that?

Re: Biden

Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:45 am
by Montag
Because they are designed as an insult.
secondly because you will only be disappointed and thirdly because no one tells me what to do. Perhaps you are happy with censorship too?

None of you really know what's going on in front of your eyes, do you? Or you do and you like it.

Re: Biden

Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2020 8:13 am
by dm
Montag wrote:
Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:45 am
Because they are designed as an insult.
secondly because you will only be disappointed and thirdly because no one tells me what to do. Perhaps you are happy with censorship too?

None of you really know what's going on in front of your eyes, do you? Or you do and you like it.
You first said I was joking with you, but I wasn't. You now think I'm trying to insult you, but I can assure you I'm not. As I said, I want to understand where you're coming from.

I don't know whether or not your answers would disappoint me but, if they did, so be it. No big deal.

I've not told you what to do. I've simply asked you 4 questions.

I've no idea where the issue of censorship comes into me asking you these questions but, if it does, you'd surely concede that I'm asking you for answers and you're refusing to give them.

Re: Biden

Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2020 2:12 pm
by UxbridgeR
Montag wrote:
Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:45 am
None of you really know what's going on in front of your eyes, do you? Or you do and you like it.
I'm sure most of us can see the things you're talking about. They simply don't have the credibility for us that they apparently do for you.

So for you, hearsay evidence about an allegedly overheard conversation between SC judges is enough to convince you that they know the election was rigged, but are dismissing the case because they're running scared, rather than because it lacks sufficient judicial merit. Remember that this a court that Trump has loaded with conservative judges, whom he presumably expected would do his bidding. In any case, SC judges are protected while they're in Washington and can have 24/7 protection from US marshalls if there's deemed to be a genuine threat.

You're persuaded by YouTube videos from random sources that Trump really won the election. Meanwhile, the President and his allies have lost around 60 court cases already and the Electoral College and the Republican leader of the Senate have recognised Biden as President Elect. Tell me again how we're the ones who can't see what's going on in front of our eyes, while you're the noble man of principle, untouched by ideology, seeker of truth.

Re: Biden

Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:42 pm
by Montag
UxbridgeR wrote:
Sun Dec 20, 2020 2:12 pm
Montag wrote:
Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:45 am
None of you really know what's going on in front of your eyes, do you? Or you do and you like it.
I'm sure most of us can see the things you're talking about. They simply don't have the credibility for us that they apparently do for you.

So for you, hearsay evidence about an allegedly overheard conversation between SC judges is enough to convince you that they know the election was rigged, but are dismissing the case because they're running scared, rather than because it lacks sufficient judicial merit. Remember that this a court that Trump has loaded with conservative judges, whom he presumably expected would do his bidding. In any case, SC judges are protected while they're in Washington and can have 24/7 protection from US marshalls if there's deemed to be a genuine threat.

You're persuaded by YouTube videos from random sources that Trump really won the election. Meanwhile, the President and his allies have lost around 60 court cases already and the Electoral College and the Republican leader of the Senate have recognised Biden as President Elect. Tell me again how we're the ones who can't see what's going on in front of our eyes, while you're the noble man of principle, untouched by ideology, seeker of truth.
What's wrong with seeking the truth? We're not all conformists.

Most court cases have not been heard and McConnell is a typical lazy Republican who wants a quiet life. They've been round his house, remember? I use my eyes, judgement and instinct. The accumulation of evidence, testimony and sheer weight of anomalies is becoming an embarrassment in the US. Biden and Harris look insecure and lack the confidence that election winners always show - besides that silly old fart had no chance of winning - yet he did, apparently . If something's too 'good' to be true it nearly always is. Do not believe the Mainstream Media. They have lied to us for decades not just on political matters but on everything. How many times have you been to a match - seen Rangers outplay the scousers or Manure or some other favoured side only to read in the papers the next day how great the big sides were and how easily Rangers were overpowered. The refs' help seldom being mentioned and the vast expenditure difference never being mentioned. I was a Guardian reader for decades but bit by bit I started to become disillusioned reading reports of events I'd attended totally distorted from fact. Now I don't bother with newspapers unless I'm decorating the house - then I spread the free local out. Similar to the way you spread out The Socialist Worker. :wink:

I'm reminded of a story that Pierre Salinger told about Jack Kennedy during the Bay of Pigs crisis. JFK cancelled a Press conference saying he had a cold while the situation was still secret from the public. Salinger, his Press secretary who was in the dark was confused saying Mr President you haven't got a cold. Something's going on. JFK said as they jumped in the limo : "You bet somethings going on - and when you find out what it is you better grab ya balls!!

President Trump has appointed Richard Donoghue Deputy AG. His father was Jack Kennedy's personal attorney.

Re: Biden

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2020 10:38 am
by Esox Lucius
Surely this fantasist nonsense belongs in RAOIS now?

Re: Biden

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2020 5:16 pm
by BiscuitRanger
:!: aniclap
Esox Lucius wrote:
Mon Dec 21, 2020 10:38 am
Surely this fantasist nonsense belongs in RAOIS now?
aniclap aniclap

Yes please.This has descended into one mans desperate and deranged defence of the most tenuous, Turkey shoot of a "rage against the machine". There ain't just no machine... its delusional to think there is. Lil Trump just can't understand that no one loves him. I'm sure, and to paraphrase moontag, you're a blind idiot if you cant see that, not so many voted for Biden, they just voted against lil Donnie.

Re: Biden

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2020 8:39 pm
by Montag
BiscuitRanger wrote:
Mon Dec 21, 2020 5:16 pm
:!: aniclap
Esox Lucius wrote:
Mon Dec 21, 2020 10:38 am
Surely this fantasist nonsense belongs in RAOIS now?
aniclap aniclap

Yes please.This has descended into one mans desperate and deranged defence of the most tenuous, Turkey shoot of a "rage against the machine". There ain't just no machine... its delusional to think there is. Lil Trump just can't understand that no one loves him. I'm sure, and to paraphrase moontag, you're a blind idiot if you cant see that, not so many voted for Biden, they just voted against lil Donnie.
KING RICHARD III : Norfolk, we must have knocks; ha! must we not?
NORFOLK : We must both give and take, my gracious lord.

We must believe as we see fit.

Re: Biden

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 5:50 pm
by Giorgio
BiscuitRanger wrote:
Mon Dec 21, 2020 5:16 pm
Lil Trump just can't understand that no one loves him. I'm sure, and to paraphrase moontag, you're a blind idiot if you cant see that, not so many voted for Biden, they just voted against lil Donnie.
...I have heard many long living republicans stating that they were not voting....just passing...or even worse for the party...voting for Biden....
...and I can fully understand their choice....