Trees prediction

Serious QPR topics only. Posted images may be deleted. Off-topic or thread hijacking posts will be moved/removed and posters disallowed access to this forum. NO TICKET RELATED POSTS. ALL TICKET RELATED POSTS WILL BE DELETED. NO EXCEPTIONS. Please put ticket related posts in the right place only.

Moderators: nige101uk, willesdenr, qprdotorgadmin, ZENITH R, Virginia_R

Post Reply
User avatar
Danish Ranger
Level 2 dot.orger
Level 2 dot.orger
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:17 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Trees prediction

Post by Danish Ranger » Tue Nov 26, 2019 11:44 am

We all know that we will need to score twice to get a get a draw, so I am affraid we will come up short under the lights tomorrow

1-2 with Eze to get a late consolation from the spot

User avatar
White Duck
Level 3 dot.orger
Level 3 dot.orger
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: Bournemouth

Re: Trees prediction

Post by White Duck » Tue Nov 26, 2019 2:42 pm

Warburton needs to field a team built from the back to at least keep their score down to one as that would be a step in the right direction: we will lose most games if we continue letting in at least two goals.

Drop Lumley: play Kelly if fit or Barnes.
Hopefully Barbet is fit: play a back four of Wallace @ LB, two of Barbet/Hall/Leistner @ CB, Rangel @ RB.
Amos & Scowen @ DM
Manning @ LM, Eze @ CM, BOS @ RM
Hugill @ CF

1-1
Lex Talionis........

User avatar
Esox Lucius
dot.org vip
dot.org vip
Posts: 21147
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:17 pm
Location: Banbury, Oxon.

Re: Trees prediction

Post by Esox Lucius » Tue Nov 26, 2019 3:50 pm

6-5 QPR.
It's not the despair that will kill you, it's the hope.

User avatar
222gers
Level 5 dot.orger
Level 5 dot.orger
Posts: 5055
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: LONDON

Re: Trees prediction

Post by 222gers » Tue Nov 26, 2019 6:24 pm

Surely........surely, we will eventually come up against a team whose strikers are off form and in a cow's arse and banjo situation. Therefore, 2-0 to the Rangers.

User avatar
W12Allstars
Level 4 dot.orger
Level 4 dot.orger
Posts: 3842
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:22 pm
Location: Kingsridge, South Devon

Re: Trees prediction

Post by W12Allstars » Tue Nov 26, 2019 11:22 pm

White Duck wrote:
Tue Nov 26, 2019 2:42 pm
Warburton needs to field a team built from the back to at least keep their score down to one as that would be a step in the right direction: we will lose most games if we continue letting in at least two goals.

Drop Lumley: play Kelly if fit or Barnes.
Hopefully Barbet is fit: play a back four of Wallace @ LB, two of Barbet/Hall/Leistner @ CB, Rangel @ RB.
Amos & Scowen @ DM
Manning @ LM, Eze @ CM, BOS @ RM
Hugill @ CF

1-1
Interesting how differently we view things. I think Hugill is vastly overrated. Needs too many chances to score and I just can't warm to him.

Amos I'd love to see do well, but so far has looked lightweight and not up to the level required.

I'd far rather start Wells up front any day.
Far better is it to dare mighty things, than to dwell in the twighlight that knows neither victory nor defeat - T Roosevelt

User avatar
White Duck
Level 3 dot.orger
Level 3 dot.orger
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: Bournemouth

Re: Trees prediction

Post by White Duck » Tue Nov 26, 2019 11:31 pm

W12Allstars wrote:
Tue Nov 26, 2019 11:22 pm
White Duck wrote:
Tue Nov 26, 2019 2:42 pm
Warburton needs to field a team built from the back to at least keep their score down to one as that would be a step in the right direction: we will lose most games if we continue letting in at least two goals.

Drop Lumley: play Kelly if fit or Barnes.
Hopefully Barbet is fit: play a back four of Wallace @ LB, two of Barbet/Hall/Leistner @ CB, Rangel @ RB.
Amos & Scowen @ DM
Manning @ LM, Eze @ CM, BOS @ RM
Hugill @ CF

1-1
Interesting how differently we view things. I think Hugill is vastly overrated. Needs too many chances to score and I just can't warm to him.

Amos I'd love to see do well, but so far has looked lightweight and not up to the level required.

I'd far rather start Wells up front any day.
Just basing it on Friday's game when I thought Amos and Hugill were amongst our best players. I would play Hugill and Wells ideally but that makes us too offensive and increases the chances of another two goals going in at the wrong end.
Lex Talionis........

User avatar
dm
dot.org player kit 2007
dot.org player kit 2007
Posts: 13332
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:21 pm
Location: Just over the border...

Re: Trees prediction

Post by dm » Wed Nov 27, 2019 6:29 am

Whether we play one or two upfront will be determined by whether it's three or four at the back. In general, I think we play better with four. In a 4231 formation I would like to see if Wells could play in the three behind Hugill so we still get both of them in the starting 11.

No clean sheet tonight but we'll manage a Desmond.

User avatar
UxbridgeR
dot.org legend
dot.org legend
Posts: 10078
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 12:45 pm

Re: Trees prediction

Post by UxbridgeR » Wed Nov 27, 2019 9:14 am

Esox Lucius wrote:
Tue Nov 26, 2019 3:50 pm
6-5 QPR.
:lol:

I hope MW sticks with his attacking approach and I think he will. Clean sheets are so 1980s.
Are headphones getting bigger, or are idiots getting smaller ?

User avatar
Esox Lucius
dot.org vip
dot.org vip
Posts: 21147
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:17 pm
Location: Banbury, Oxon.

Re: Trees prediction

Post by Esox Lucius » Wed Nov 27, 2019 9:44 am

UxbridgeR wrote:
Wed Nov 27, 2019 9:14 am
Esox Lucius wrote:
Tue Nov 26, 2019 3:50 pm
6-5 QPR.
:lol:

I hope MW sticks with his attacking approach and I think he will. Clean sheets are so 1980s.
Yeah, who pays good money to see defenders play well? :D
It's not the despair that will kill you, it's the hope.

User avatar
Montag
Level 4 dot.orger
Level 4 dot.orger
Posts: 4624
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 8:26 pm

Re: Trees prediction

Post by Montag » Wed Nov 27, 2019 11:27 am

We are due a win. 2-1. We need a win to stay in touch.
"Go, muster men: My council is my shield ; We must be brief, when traitors brave the field."
Richard III, Act IV, W. Shakespeare

jimjams
Level 2 dot.orger
Level 2 dot.orger
Posts: 559
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:50 pm

Re: Trees prediction

Post by jimjams » Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:16 pm

I agree we are due a win. I think we will get one but not a clean sheet.

User avatar
Wegerle
Level 4 dot.orger
Level 4 dot.orger
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Holland

Re: Trees prediction

Post by Wegerle » Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:08 pm

jimjams wrote:
Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:16 pm
I agree we are due a win. I think we will get one but not a clean sheet.
The second part of your prediction is already confirmed. Hope the first will also materialize in the coming 90 minutes!

User avatar
Southgate Hoop
Level 3 dot.orger
Level 3 dot.orger
Posts: 2345
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:04 pm

Re: Trees prediction

Post by Southgate Hoop » Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:17 pm

We look awful. Disjointed, no confidence, no talent. Can’t see anything but ya shipping a couple more tonight.
This is alarming form now I must say.

jonf45
Level 2 dot.orger
Level 2 dot.orger
Posts: 898
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 8:18 am
Location: langtoft,Peterborough

Re: Trees prediction

Post by jonf45 » Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:17 pm

Ben Watson is destroying our midfield..... aniwall

Post Reply