Trees prediction

[Danish Ranger]

We all know that we will need to score twice to get a get a draw, so I am affraid we will come up short under the lights tomorrow

1-2 with Eze to get a late consolation from the spot

[White Duck]

Warburton needs to field a team built from the back to at least keep their score down to one as that would be a step in the right direction: we will lose most games if we continue letting in at least two goals.

Drop Lumley: play Kelly if fit or Barnes.
Hopefully Barbet is fit: play a back four of Wallace @ LB, two of Barbet/Hall/Leistner @ CB, Rangel @ RB.
Amos & Scowen @ DM
Manning @ LM, Eze @ CM, BOS @ RM
Hugill @ CF

1-1

[Esox Lucius]

6-5 QPR.

[222gers]

Surely........surely, we will eventually come up against a team whose strikers are off form and in a cow's arse and banjo situation. Therefore, 2-0 to the Rangers.

[W12Allstars]

Warburton needs to field a team built from the back to at least keep their score down to one as that would be a step in the right direction: we will lose most games if we continue letting in at least two goals.

Drop Lumley: play Kelly if fit or Barnes.
Hopefully Barbet is fit: play a back four of Wallace @ LB, two of Barbet/Hall/Leistner @ CB, Rangel @ RB.
Amos & Scowen @ DM
Manning @ LM, Eze @ CM, BOS @ RM
Hugill @ CF

1-1

Interesting how differently we view things. I think Hugill is vastly overrated. Needs too many chances to score and I just can't warm to him.

Amos I'd love to see do well, but so far has looked lightweight and not up to the level required.

I'd far rather start Wells up front any day.

[White Duck]

Warburton needs to field a team built from the back to at least keep their score down to one as that would be a step in the right direction: we will lose most games if we continue letting in at least two goals.

Drop Lumley: play Kelly if fit or Barnes.
Hopefully Barbet is fit: play a back four of Wallace @ LB, two of Barbet/Hall/Leistner @ CB, Rangel @ RB.
Amos & Scowen @ DM
Manning @ LM, Eze @ CM, BOS @ RM
Hugill @ CF

1-1

Interesting how differently we view things. I think Hugill is vastly overrated. Needs too many chances to score and I just can't warm to him.

Amos I'd love to see do well, but so far has looked lightweight and not up to the level required.

I'd far rather start Wells up front any day.

Just basing it on Friday's game when I thought Amos and Hugill were amongst our best players. I would play Hugill and Wells ideally but that makes us too offensive and increases the chances of another two goals going in at the wrong end.

[dm]

Whether we play one or two upfront will be determined by whether it's three or four at the back. In general, I think we play better with four. In a 4231 formation I would like to see if Wells could play in the three behind Hugill so we still get both of them in the starting 11.

No clean sheet tonight but we'll manage a Desmond.

[UxbridgeR]

6-5 QPR.

I hope MW sticks with his attacking approach and I think he will. Clean sheets are so 1980s.

[Esox Lucius]

6-5 QPR.

I hope MW sticks with his attacking approach and I think he will. Clean sheets are so 1980s.

Yeah, who pays good money to see defenders play well?

[Montag]

We are due a win. 2-1. We need a win to stay in touch.

[jimjams]

I agree we are due a win. I think we will get one but not a clean sheet.

[Wegerle]

I agree we are due a win. I think we will get one but not a clean sheet.

The second part of your prediction is already confirmed. Hope the first will also materialize in the coming 90 minutes!

[Southgate Hoop]

We look awful. Disjointed, no confidence, no talent. Can’t see anything but ya shipping a couple more tonight.
This is alarming form now I must say.

[jonf45]

Ben Watson is destroying our midfield.....