You can't win em all that's true BG. But to get all four attacking options wrong....now that's QPRishBear-Grills wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:15 pmMy main point was that even a punt that looked reasonable at the time in term of the supposed potential of twhe player turned out very poorly.White Duck wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 7:37 pmIt seems we paid between 2-3 Million Pounds for Washington: not a lot if we were in the Premier but based on our current financial situation this purchase has been a disaster financially (and sadly on the pitch too). Certainly not a worthwhile gamble IMO.Bear-Grills wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 10:02 am
Don't you think they are already looking for a decent striker, and have been for some time? E.G. Washington was a worthwhile gamble, no one thought that was a bad move, and look how that turned out. There isn't that much obvious/affordable talent out there
Serious QPR topics only. Posted images may be deleted. Off-topic or thread hijacking posts will be moved/removed and posters disallowed access to this forum. NO TICKET RELATED POSTS. ALL TICKET RELATED POSTS WILL BE DELETED. NO EXCEPTIONS. Please put ticket related posts in the right place only.
- Posts: 10298
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:23 pm
- Location: Northern Ireland
- Level 3 dot.orger
- Posts: 3434
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 7:41 pm
Ain't that the truth...Damien wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:48 pmYou can't win em all that's true BG. But to get all four attacking options wrong....now that's QPRishBear-Grills wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:15 pmMy main point was that even a punt that looked reasonable at the time in term of the supposed potential of twhe player turned out very poorly.
If drink isn't the answer, you were asked the wrong question
- Level 4 dot.orger
- Posts: 3501
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:34 am
- Location: New York City
My concern is that given our history, replacing him might increase the risk of us getting relegated.n22hoop wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 2:18 pmSatch, what would be a bigger disaster than getting relegated?Satch wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:47 amThis, the trend suggests us making mid-season managerial appointments takes the team backwards. Holloway is doing a very poor job, but a rash decision is not going to help. The club should be working now to identify a list of potential managerial targets that fit with the clubs vision, have potential and would be willing to come here and then remove Holloway the day after our last game assuming they find a suitable target.UxbridgeR wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 10:51 am
That's what people said when Ramsey was in charge, so we sacked him, got JFH in, and it did get worse. They said the same about JFH, we sacked him too, and it's continued (results wise at any rate) to get worse. I don't doubt there are managers out there who could do a better job, but who amongst them would want to come here even if we could afford them. We don't have a great track record of identifying managerial talent, so of course it could get worse.
He can't take this team forward, but removing him could be an even bigger disaster.
- Level 5 dot.orger
- Posts: 6804
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:07 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 32 guests